"One tenant can see another tenant's data"
Isolation bolted on after launch is a breach waiting to happen. We enforce tenant boundaries at the query layer, from the first table.
"Billing and entitlements are out of sync"
Plans, seats, usage and feature gates drift until invoices are wrong. We wire billing to entitlements so what you charge is what they get.
"Every new feature slows the next one down"
Velocity dies when the architecture fights you. We build the boundaries that let a small team keep shipping weekly at scale.
Every SaaS engagement ships with the tenancy, billing and access-control foundations in place, so the growth work later is scaling knobs, not a re-architecture.
SaaS questions, answered
Tenant isolation is enforced at the data layer, not left to application code to remember. Shared schema with row-level scoping by default, dedicated schemas or databases when a customer or regulation demands it, decided per project, not by dogma.
Yes. Stripe, Paddle, Chargebee or a billing system you already run, wired to entitlements so plans, seats and usage stay in sync. Integrations into Slack, Salesforce, HubSpot and the rest are the norm, not a rebuild.
That's a core service. We stabilise the tenancy and billing, cut the architecture that is blocking releases, and document what was wrong, see backend rescue.
A focused, multi-tenant v1 with auth, billing and a clean UI usually ships in 4-6 weeks, so you get real usage data early. Fixed price after a scoping call, and larger scope is quoted honestly rather than underpriced to win the deal.
Building a platform, not just a feature?
Bring the scope. You'll get a fixed quote, a timeline, and a straight answer on the tenancy and billing work involved.
Discuss a SaaS build